Stone artefacts and recent research in the archaeology of mainland Southeast Asian hunter-gatherers
نویسنده
چکیده
In recent decades the study of stone artefact technology has made many technical advances and substantial contributions to the archaeology of many regions. Until recently, mainland southeast Asian has benefited little from these advances, in part because of the paucity of evidence and in part because of prevailing conceptual frameworks that were poorly suited to the available evidence. The Middle Pleistocene record has a very sparse lithic record suggestive of little more than the presence of hominins on the landscape. The Late and Terminal Pleistocene is better represented and recent work on stone artefact assemblages has demonstrated that the assemblages document important behavioural variation that challenges previous notions of Pleistocene huntergatherers in mainland Southeast Asia. Holocene assemblages, especially from Luang Prabang and the Salween River areas, hold promise for addressing questions about the transition to agriculture, currently a poorly understood process in mainland Southeast Asia.
منابع مشابه
THREE STYLES OF DARWINIAN EVOLUTION IN THE ANALYSIS OF STONE ARTEFACTS: Which One to Use in Mainland Southeast Asia?
Our understanding of fl aked stone artefacts from assemblages in mainland Southeast Asia is constrained by a shortage of robust and fl exible theory to generate suitable methods of analysis. I review three candidate theories derived from Darwinian evolutionary principles to identify the most suitable for investigating fl aked stone artefacts from mainland Southeast Asia. The demands of the theo...
متن کاملWhat attributes are important for the measurement of assemblage reduction intensity? Results from an experimental stone artefact assemblage with relevance to the Hoabinhian of mainland Southeast Asia
Our understanding of variation in the technology of flaked stone artefacts from mainland Southeast Asia during the terminal Pleistocene and Holocene periods has improved little since they were originally labelled ‘‘Hoabinhian’’ in 1932. Chronological and geographical variation has been described in terms of typological differences, but there are few anthropological explanations of lithic divers...
متن کاملHunter-gatherers in southeast Asia: from prehistory to the present.
Anatomically modern hunter-gatherers expanded from Africa into Southeast Asia at least 50,000 years ago, where they probably encountered and interacted with populations of Homo erectus and Homo floresiensis and the recently discovered Denisovans. Simulation studies suggest that these hunter-gatherers may well have followed a coastal route that ultimately led to the settlement of Sahul, while ar...
متن کاملPercussive technology in human evolution: an introduction to a comparative approach in fossil and living primates.
Percussive technology is part of the behavioural suite of several fossil and living primates. Stone Age ancestors used lithic artefacts in pounding activities, which could have been most important in the earliest stages of stone working. This has relevant evolutionary implications, as other primates such as chimpanzees and some monkeys use stone hammer-and-anvil combinations to crack hard-shell...
متن کاملSocial learning and technological evolution during the Clovis colonization of the New World.
A long-standing debate in Pleistocene archaeology concerns the sources of variation in the technology of colonizing hunter-gatherers. One prominent example of this debate is Clovis technology (13,350-12,500 calendar years before present), which represents the earliest widespread and currently recognizable remains of hunter-gatherers in North America. Clovis projectile points appear to have been...
متن کامل